Convert to WebP

100% Private • Report Issue

Select File

or drag and drop files here

Select an image to convert

Step-by-Step Workflow

Upload source image(s) for WebP conversion

Verify quality setting matches use case

Download and verify file size reduction

Specifications

Output format: WebP (lossy or lossless)
Recommended quality: 85% (imperceptible loss)
Size reduction: 25-35% vs JPG, 50-75% vs PNG photos
Browser support: 96% (Chrome/Firefox/Edge/Safari 14+)
Transparency: Fully supported (26% smaller than PNG)

The Challenge

Images consume 60-70% of average webpage weight—JPG/PNG files create 5-10 second mobile load times that bounce 53% of visitors. Google's Core Web Vitals penalize slow images in search rankings, directly reducing organic traffic. WebP solves this: 25-35% smaller than JPG at identical visual quality, 50-75% smaller than PNG for photos. Uses VP8 video codec compression achieving superior results vs legacy formats. Supports transparency at 26% smaller size than PNG. With 96% browser support (Chrome/Firefox/Edge/Safari 14+), WebP is production-ready for modern web deployment. Sites converting to WebP report: 1.5-2s faster LCP (Largest Contentful Paint), 15-20 point PageSpeed score improvement, 10-15% mobile conversion rate increase from faster loads. For e-commerce with 1000 daily visitors, 2-second speed improvement = 20-30 additional conversions monthly.

Best Practices

Convert above-the-fold images first—hero images and visible content impact LCP score most, below-fold images less critical for Core Web Vitals
For e-commerce product photos, 85% quality maintains zoom detail while reducing page weight—faster mobile loads increase conversion 10-15%
Transparent PNG logos/icons: WebP conversion preserves alpha channel perfectly with 26-40% smaller files—ideal for overlays, headers, watermarks
Batch convert galleries by processing files sequentially—maintain original filenames for easy find-replace in HTML. 50 images = 10 minutes manual work
Mobile users benefit most—mobile bandwidth costs 40× more in many regions. WebP savings reduce user data consumption significantly
Keep JPG/PNG originals archived—enables re-conversion at different quality or future AVIF migration when browser support improves
WordPress: Use ShortPixel, Imagify, or EWWW plugins for automatic WebP conversion during upload—handles conversion + fallback code automatically
Test WebP quality at actual display dimensions—compression artifacts invisible at 500px width become visible at 2000px full resolution
For maximum compression, resize images to exact display dimensions BEFORE WebP conversion—unnecessary pixels waste bandwidth in all formats
Serve WebP via CDN with Accept header detection—Cloudflare/CloudFront automatically serve WebP to supporting browsers without <picture> code

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the optimal WebP quality for balancing size and visual quality?

85% for 95% of use cases—produces imperceptible difference from JPG 95% but 30-40% smaller. Human eyes cannot distinguish 85% vs 95% WebP at typical screen viewing distances (under 2000px width). Use 90-95% only for critical hero images or portfolio work requiring pixel-perfect quality. Use 75-80% for thumbnails, backgrounds, or non-critical assets. Test by comparing side-by-side at actual display size—zoom to 100% and check detail preservation.

Do I need fallback images for browsers that don't support WebP?

Yes for production sites targeting 100% users. WebP works in 96% of browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari 14+, Opera) but fails in IE11 and Safari 13 and older (4% market share, mostly legacy enterprise or outdated iOS). Use <picture> element: <source srcset='image.webp' type='image/webp'><img src='fallback.jpg'>. Modern browsers load WebP, old browsers load JPG. Without fallback, 4% of visitors see broken images. Check analytics to see if your 4% justifies implementation effort.

How much smaller will my specific images become after WebP conversion?

Depends on source format and content complexity. JPG photos→WebP: 25-35% at 85% quality. PNG photos→WebP: 50-75% (PNG terrible for photos). PNG graphics→WebP: 10-30% (PNG already efficient for flat colors). Simple content (gradients, solid colors) compresses 40%+. Complex content (foliage, fabric textures, noise) compresses 20-30%. Test 5-10 representative images before batch converting entire library. Diminishing returns above 90% quality.

Does WebP support transparent backgrounds like PNG?

Yes—WebP fully supports alpha channel transparency identical to PNG, but with 22-40% better compression. Converting transparent PNG logos/icons to WebP maintains transparency perfectly while reducing file size significantly. WebP transparency uses less browser memory and renders faster than PNG—dual benefit of smaller downloads and better client-side performance. Ideal for overlay graphics, watermarks, logos on colored backgrounds.

Should I convert all website images to WebP or just photos?

Convert everything over 5KB: photos, graphics, icons, backgrounds. Photos gain most (30-50% reduction), graphics gain less (10-20%), but every KB improves page speed. Exception: very small icons under 2-3KB may increase in size due to WebP header overhead (fixed 20-byte metadata cost). For favicons, tiny UI elements, keep PNG/SVG. For images 5KB+, always convert. Even 10% savings on 100KB image = 10KB × 1000 pageviews = 10MB bandwidth saved.

Can I convert WebP back to JPG if I need broader compatibility?

Yes, but you lose WebP's compression benefits. Converting WebP→JPG increases file size 30-40% (reverses savings). Use case: sharing images on platforms that don't support WebP (email clients, old forums, some social media). For web deployment, use <picture> fallback instead—serves WebP to modern browsers, JPG to old browsers automatically. Converting WebP→JPG→WebP compounds quality loss (double lossy compression)—always keep original high-quality sources.

Does WebP conversion affect image SEO or search ranking?

WebP improves SEO indirectly through page speed. Google's Core Web Vitals include LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)—faster image loads directly boost search rankings. Sites converting to WebP report 15-30% LCP improvement, translating to ranking gains. Google Images supports WebP natively—no SEO penalty. Alt text, filename, and surrounding content matter more for image search ranking than format. Faster page = better user experience = higher rankings.